An Exploration of Judgment and Decision Making among Novice Outdoor Leaders: A Dual-Processes Approach

Authors

  • Bruce Martin Ohio University
  • David Schmid Foothills Academy, Wheat Ridge, CO
  • Melissa Parker University of Northern Colorado

Keywords:

outdoor leadership development, judgment and decision making, naturalistic decision making, rational decision making, dual-processes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the development of judgment

and decision making competency among novice outdoor leaders

participating in a Wilderness Education Association National Standards

Program course. Specifically, the study focused on two aspects

of decision making: (1) contextual variables that influenced decisions

of course participants and (2) the nature of the process used to make

decisions. While judgment and decision-making were conceptualized

in terms of the dual-processes approach (Evans, 2008; Kahneman,

2003; Reyna, 2004), data were collected and analyzed using naturalistic

research methods (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Patton, 1990). After

data analysis participant readiness, physical safety, environmental

impact, group cohesion, and educational mindset were identified as

significant variables in the participants' decision-making process during

the course. Implications for theory and practice are considered.

Issue

Section

Regular Papers