Recreation on the Battlefield: Planning for Shifting Visitor Use at Monocacy National Battlefield
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2023-11918Keywords:
cultural preservation, outdoor recreation, spatiotemporal analysis, national parks, historic battlefields, conflictAbstract
Outdoor recreation is increasing worldwide, driving recreationists to seek new sites for active leisure pursuits. Recreational use at sites of cultural significance (i.e., historic battlefields) may conflict with their primary legislated purpose, diverting financial and human resources. We documented this process at Monocacy National Battlefield, a U.S. National Park Service site in an urbanizing region of the State of Maryland. A novel mixed-methods approach included a 1) scoping review of relevant peer-reviewed literature; 2) an anonymized, spatiotemporal analysis of visitor trips and place of residence; and 3) cross-sectional, on-site visitor survey of local and destination visitors using an Importance-Performance Analysis. Results illustrate a significant segment of local visitors and recent growth in trips to sites other than the battlefield visitor center. Local visitors were also significantly more likely to identify higher importance to recreation-related facilities, services, and park attributes. While population growth slowed in the recent decade within Frederick County, future increases may yield potential for conflict between recreational and historic uses. Triangulating spatiotemporal and survey-based methods can assist managers in understanding recreation demand in similar units experiencing scope creep to inform iterative outreach, monitoring, planning, and adaptive management to respond to changing demography.
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Bond, N. (2016). Using a Delphi approach to identify managers’ preferences for visitor interpretation at Canterbury Cathedral World Heritage Site. Tourism Management, 54, 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.014
Balmford, A., Green, J.M.H., Anderson, M., Beresford, J., Huang C, Naidoo, R., Walpole, M., & Manica, A. (2015) Walk on the wild side: Estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLOS Biology 13(2), e1002074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074
Bayramova, V., Kryukovskiy, A., Kupriianova, A., Bobritskaya, Y., & Smertin, V. (2021). Modern problems of historical parks recreational potential comprehensive assessment. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 876(1), 12011.
Besculides, A., Lee, M. E., & McCormick, P. J. (2002). Residents’ perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00066-4
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Bowker, J., Bergstrom, J., & Gill, J. (2004). The Virginia creeper trail: An assessment of user demographics, preferences, and economics. Virginia Department of Conservation.
Brown, T. J. (1999). Antecedents of culturally significant tourist behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), 676-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00004-3
Buckley, R. (2018). Tourism and natural world heritage: A complicated relationship. Journal of Travel Research, 57(5), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0047287517713723
Cahill, K., Collins, R., McPartland, S., Pitt, A., & Verbos, R. (2018). Overview of the Interagency Visitor Use Management Framework and the uses of social science in its implementation in the National Park Service. The George Wright Forum, 35(1), 32-41.
Choi, J., & Jeon, H. (2021). Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management, 5(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12
Daniels, M. L., & Marion, J. L. (2006). Visitor Evaluations of Management Actions at a Highly Impacted Appalachian Trail Camping Area. Environmental Management, 38(6), 1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0368-3
de Koning, R., Egiz, A., Kotecha, J., Ciuculete, A. C., Ooi, S. Z. Y., Bankole, N. D. A., Erhabor, J., Higginbotham, G., Khan, M., Dalle, D. U., Sichimba, D., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Kanmounye, U. S. (2021). Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates. Frontiers in Surgery, 8, 326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.690680
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley.
Driver, B. L., & Brown, P. J. (1978). The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: A rationale. In Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources: Proceedings of the workshop, January 1978, Tucson, Arizona. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, (RM-55), 24-31.
Driver, B. L. (2008). Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation. State
College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Dustin, D., McAvoy, L., & Ogden, L. (2005). Land as legacy: 20th century American presidents left land as their contribution for future generations to enjoy. Parks is Recreation, 40(5), 60-6.
Fefer, J. P., Hallo, J. C., Collins, R. H., Baldwin, E. D., & Brownlee, M. T. (2021). From
Displaced to Misplaced: Exploring the Experience of Visitors Who Were ‘Crowded Out’ of
Their Recreation Destination. Leisure Sciences, 1-20.
Geng, D. C., Innes, J., Wu, W., & Wang, G. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w
Gunther, K. A., Wilmot, K. R., Cain, S. L., Wyman, T., Reinertson, E. G., & Amanda, M. B.
(2018). Case study: Managing human-habituated bears to enhance survival, habitat
effectiveness, and public viewing. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 12(3), 373–386.
Harrison, D.L., Scruggs, C.J., Hendrick, M.L., Caraway, J.K., Morales, B., Jones, J.M., Kane, B.K., Perkins, I.M., & Zajchowski, C.A.B. (2022). Contemporary issues, opportunities, and resources for the U.S. outdoor recreation profession. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100560
Integrated Resource Management Applications [IRMA] (2022, March). Park Reports: Monocacy National Battlefield. United States National Park Service. http://irma.nps.gov/STATS/Reports/Park/MONO
Interagency Visitor Use Management Council. (2016). Visitor Use Management Framework: A Guide to Providing Sustainable Outdoor Recreation, Edition One. Retrieved from https://visitorusemanagement.nps.gov/VUM/Framework
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing
Company.
Laitos, J.G., & Reiss, R.B. (2004). Recreation wars for our natural resources, Environmental Law, 34(4), 1091-1122.
Manning, R. E. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
Maryland State Archives. (2022, March 11). Population growth rates. Retrieved from https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/html/pop.html#rates
McAvoy, L. (2002) American Indians, place meanings and the old/new west. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(4), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949978
McCann, J.E., Zajchowski, C.A.B., Hill, E.L., & Zhu, X. (2021). Air pollution and outdoor recreation on urban trails: A case study of the Elizabeth River Trail, Norfolk. Atmosphere 12, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101304
Miller, Z.D., Freimund, W., Crabtree, S.A., & Ryan, E.P. (2021). No limits of acceptable change: A proposed research framework for informing visitor use management in the context of cultural resources. Sustainability, 13, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010377
Monz, C., Mitrovich, M., D’Antonio, A., & Sisneros-Kidd, A. (2019). Using mobile device data to estimate visitation in parks and protected areas: An example from the nature reserve of Orange County, California. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 37(4) doi: 10.18666/JPRA-2019-9899
Morgan, N. K., Newman, P., & Wallace, G. N. (2007). Conflicts associated with recreational shooting on the Pawnee National Grassland. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(3), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200701322563
National Park Service. (2021a). National Park System Units. https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/national-park-system.htm
National Park Service. (2021b) NPS Designations. https://www.nps.gov/articles/nps-designations.htm
National Park Service. (2020). Enabling Legislation. https://www.nps.gov/amis/learn/management/enabling_legislation.htm
National Park Service. (2015). Foundation document: Monocacy National Battlefield. http://npshistory.com/publications/foundation-documents/mono-fd-2015.pdf
Perry, E.E., Brownlee, M.T.J, Powell, R., Sharp, R.L., Sene-Harper, A., & Dagan, D.T. (2021). Visitor characteristics across and within seasons at Joshua Tree National Park. Report delivered to management staff at Joshua Tree National Park, Department of Interior, National Park Service. In fulfillment of agreement PP18AC01217.
Ray, C. (2013). The sacred and the body politic at Ireland’s holy wells. International Social Science Journal, 62(205-206), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12000
Repanshek, K. (2022, January 23). Funding imbalance and the national parks. National Parks Traveler. Retrieved from https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2022/01/funding-imbalance-and-national-parks
Rice, W., Taff, B.D., Newman, P., Miller, Z.D., D’Antonio, A., Baker, J.T., Monz, C., Newton, J.N., & Zipp, K.Y. (2019). Grand expectations: Understanding visitor motivations and outcome interference in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 37(2), 26-44.
Tranel, M.J., & Hall, A. (2003). Parks as battlegrounds: Managing conflicting values. In D. Harmon & A. Putney (Ed.). The full value of parks: from economics to the intangible. (pp. 64-70). Rowman & Littlefield.
Santos, C. A., & Zobler, K. A. (2012). The bridge on the river Elbe: World heritage in a modern city. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 484-486. 10.1016/j.annals.2011.06.005
Schwarz, O. (2013). What should nature sound like? Techniques of engagement with nature sites and sonic preferences of Israeli visitors. Annals of Tourism Research, 42, 382-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.03.001
Shapiro, H.G., Willcox, A.S., Verant, M.L., & Willcox, E.V. (2021). How has white-nose syndrome changed cave management in national parks? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 45(3), 422-429.
Sharp, R.L., Sharp, J.A., & Miller, C.A. (2015). An island in a sea of development: An examination of place attachment, activity type, and crowding in an urban national park, Visitor Studies, 18(2), 196-213.
Streetlight Data. (2018). Our Methodology and Data Sources. https://learn.streetlightdata.com/methodology-data-sources-white-paper
Sweeney, P., & Opotow, S. (2013). “Why there?” Islamophobia, environmental conflict, and justice at ground zero. Social Justice Research, 26, 492-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0199-6
United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. (2022, April 16). Urbanization –
Overview. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/caddis-vol2/urbanization-overview
Vaske, J., Beaman, J., Barreto, H., & Shelby, L. (2010). An extension and further validation
of the Potential for Conflict Index. Leisure Sciences, 32(3), 240–254.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01490401003712648
Young, E. (2014). Battlefield to baseball diamond: The Niagara Parks Commission and Queenston Heights Park. London Journal of Canadian Studies, 29(1). DOI: 10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2014v29.003
Zajchowski, C.A.B., Brownlee, M.T.J., & Rose, J. (2018). Air quality and the visitor experience in parks and protected areas. Tourism Geographies, 21(4), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1522546
Ziesler & Spalding (2020). Statistical Abstract. United States Department of the Interior,
National Park Service. Natural Resource Data Series NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRDS-2021/1326
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact gbates@sagamorepub.com for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.