Is Recreation Part of the Story? Stakeholders’ Narratives about Youth Retention in a Rural State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2024-12057Keywords:
youth engagement, population, community attachment, place attachment, future orientationAbstract
Changing demographics in rural states have been on the forefront of policymakers' minds. Trends such as high median age, low birth rates, and pronounced youth outmigration compound larger challenges of workforce and community development. Many rural states are promoting recreational and natural amenities as an attraction, hoping to lure established adult newcomers or returnees to resettle. However, it is unclear precisely how rural stakeholders perceive recreation to be an effective tool in attracting and retaining youth and young adults, beyond official branding strategies and campaigns. This study sought to identify macrosystem-level messaging circulating in stories told by stakeholders in education, workforce, and quality of life domains about how recreation relates to youth future orientation and decision making. Thirty-two data collection events (interviews or focus groups) with leaders in the policymaking, state administration, and youth-serving program areas in New Hampshire (NH) were conducted in 2020-2021. Themes were achieved using a story-based methodological approach guided by a master narrative conceptual framework, which states that macrosystem-level messaging impacts individual agency and decision-making. Four themes surrounding recreation emerged: 1) recreational opportunities are storied as less impactful on youth future orientation than educational and employment opportunities; 2) statewide branding focusing on outdoor recreational amenities and experiences may not be accessible or appealing to youth; 3) youth lack meaningful community engagement and leadership opportunities, resulting in low youth voice in community development initiatives; and 4) there is an assumption that youth will ultimately leave rural areas for educational, employment, and recreational opportunities elsewhere and return later as established adults. We make recommendations for recreation providers and stakeholders, including: 1) growing youth community attachment through recreation spaces and places in rural areas, 2) providing more inclusive forms of youth-focused state and community branding, 3) advocating for youth-focused recreation and civic engagement policy/programming, and 4) developing messaging resisting narratives insinuating recreation is unimportant in youth decision making and future orientation. Rural communities following these recommendations may enhance youth quality of life and contribute to a demographically diverse and thriving population.
References
Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Place attachment (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Krannich, R. S. (2006). Community attachments as predictors of local environmental concern: The case for multiple dimensions of attachment. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 142-165.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Ecological systems theory (1992).
Brown, G., & Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27(2), 89-111.
Charmaz, K. (2009). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Reprinted 2009. Los Angeles London, SAGE.
Coatsworth, J. D., Palen, L. A., Sharp, E. H., & Ferrer-Wreder, L. (2006). Self-defining activities, expressive identity, and adolescent wellness. Applied Developmental Science, 10(3), 157-170.
Colistra, C., Bixler, R., & Schmalz, D. (2019). Exploring factors that contribute to relationship building in a community center. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(1), 1-17.
Crespo, C., Jose, P. E., Kielpikowski, M., & Pryor, J. (2013). “On solid ground”: Family and school connectedness promotes adolescents' future orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 36(5), 993-1002.
Gustafson, P. (2001). Roots and routes: Exploring the relationship between place attachment and mobility. Environment and behavior, 33(5), 667-686.
Hasford, J., Loomis, C., Nelson, G., & Pancer, S. M. (2016). Youth narratives on community experiences and sense of community and their relation to participation in an early childhood development program. Youth & Society, 48(4), 577-596.
Johnson, K. M. (2012). New Hampshire demographic trends in the twenty-first century.
Johnson, K. (2019, November 19). New Hampshire demographic trends in an era of economic turbulence. UNH. Retrieved December 19, 2022, from https://carsey.unh.edu/publication/nh-demographic-trends
Kil, N., Stein, T. V., Holland, S. M., Kim, J. J., Kim, J., & Petitte, S. (2021). The role of place attachment in recreation experience and outcome preferences among forest bathers. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35, 100410.
Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban studies, 44(5-6), 1069-1091.
Larson, L. R., Usher, L. E., & Chapmon, T. (2018). Surfers as environmental stewards: Understanding place-protecting behavior at Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Leisure Sciences, 40(5), 442-465.
Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230.
McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Syed, M. (2023). Cognitive scripts and narrative identity are shaped by structures of power. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Moore-Vissing, Q., & Mallory, B. (2020). 2020 New Hampshire Civic Health Index. Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1427&context=carsey
Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 11-22.
New Hampshire Stay Work Play; Saint Anselm College Survey Center. (2023, April 4). New Hampshire Quality of Life Survey. Stay Work Play New Hampshire. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.stayworkplay.org/survey
Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental review, 11(1), 1-59.
Price, T., & Been, N. (2018). “Figuring Out the Age Gap”: Youth Reflections on a Youth–Adult Partnership. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 36(2).
Rebellon, C. J., Stracuzzi, N. F., & Burbank, M. (2010). Youth opinions matter: retaining human capital in Coos County.
Rönnlund, M. (2020). ‘I love this place, but I won’t stay’: identification with place and imagined spatial futures among youth living in rural areas in Sweden. Young, 28(2), 123-137.
Seginer, R. (2003). Adolescent future orientation: An integrated cultural and ecological perspective. Online readings in psychology and culture, 6(1), 2307-0919.
Sharp, E. H., & Coatsworth, J. D. (2012). Adolescent future orientation: The role of identity discovery in self-defining activities and context in two rural samples. Identity, 12(2), 129-156.
Sharp, E. H., Seaman, J., Tucker, C. J., Van Gundy, K. T., & Rebellon, C. J. (2020). Adolescents’ future aspirations and expectations in the context of a shifting rural economy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 534-548.
Sharp, E. H., Tucker, C. J., Baril, M. E., Van Gundy, K. T., & Rebellon, C. J. (2015). Breadth of participation in organized and unstructured leisure activities over time and rural adolescents’ functioning. Journal of youth and adolescence, 44(1), 62-76.
Sklar, S. L., Autry, C. E., & Anderson, S. C. (2014). How park and recreation agencies engage in community development. World leisure journal, 56(4), 281-299.
Stay Work Play NH. (2017, December). 20-40 Year Olds in New Hampshire. Stay Work Play New Hampshire. Retrieved November 30, 2022, from https://www.stayworkplay.org/survey
Sullivan, R. (2019, July 17). Aging and declining populations in northern New England. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/new-england-public-policy-center-regional-briefs/2019/aging-and-declining-populations-in-northern-new-england.aspx
Syed, M., & McLean, K. C. (2022). Who gets to live the good life? Master narratives, identity, and well-being within a marginalizing society. Journal of Research in Personality, 100, 104285.
Trentelman, C. K. (2009). Place attachment and community attachment: A primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and natural resources, 22(3), 191-210.
Van Gundy, K. T., Stracuzzi, N. F., Rebellon, C. J., Tucker, C. J., & Cohn, E. S. (2011). Perceived community cohesion and the stress process in youth. Rural Sociology, 76(3), 293-318.
Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2007). Sixteen million neighbors: A multilevel study of the role of neighbors in the personal networks of the Dutch. Urban Affairs Review, 43(2), 256-284.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Sagamore Publishing LLC (hereinafter the “Copyright Owner”)
Journal Publishing Copyright Agreement for Authors
PLEASE REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT, AND INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS BY CHECKING THE ‘AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS COPYRIGHT NOTICE’ CHECKBOX BELOW.
I understand that by submitting an article to Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, I am granting the copyright to the article submitted for consideration for publication in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration to the Copyright Owner. If after consideration of the Editor of the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, the article is not accepted for publication, all copyright covered under this agreement will be automatically returned to the Author(s).
THE PUBLISHING AGREEMENT
Assignment of Copyright
I hereby assign to the Copyright Owner the copyright in the manuscript I am submitting in this online procedure and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the article is accepted for publication.
Reversion of Rights
Articles may sometimes be accepted for publication but later be rejected in the publication process, even in some cases after public posting in “Articles in Press” form, in which case all rights will revert to the Author.
Retention of Rights for Scholarly Purposes
I understand that I retain or am hereby granted the Retained Rights. The Retained Rights include the right to use the Preprint, Accepted Manuscript, and the Published Journal Article for Personal Use and Internal Institutional Use.
All journal material is under a 12 month embargo. Authors who would like to have their articles available as open access should contact gbates@sagamorepub.com for further information.
In the case of the Accepted Manuscript and the Published Journal Article, the Retained Rights exclude Commercial Use, other than use by the author in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works or to extend the Article to book length form or re-use by the author of portions or excerpts in other works.
Published Journal Article: the author may share a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI.
Author Representations
- The Article I have submitted to the journal for review is original, has been written by the stated author(s) and has not been published elsewhere.
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- The Article contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- I have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If the Article was prepared jointly with other authors, I have informed the co-author(s) of the terms of this Journal Publishing Agreement and that I am signing on their behalf as their agent, and I am authorized to do so.